GAP Report for 7/6/26
POSITIVE
Community advocacy helped preserve funding for 126 affordable apartments
On June 23rd, the Asheville City Council approved an amendment to the housing recovery portion of the Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery action plan. They shifted $19.2 million originally allocated to infrastructure and multifamily affordable housing construction to fund more single-family home repair and reconstruction work. While we continue to have concerns about the transparency and efficiency of the Renew NC home reconstruction program, the final amendment approved by City Council preserved significantly more funding for affordable multifamily housing than originally proposed last December – enough to fund a new housing development that will offer 126 affordable units. This week, we’re taking a look at what changed, why it matters, and how GAPavl supporters’ efforts contributed to this positive outcome. We’re also encouraging folks to thank City staff and Council for listening to community input.
REPORT BACKS
Building on Buncombe County’s Commitment to Preventing Displacement
Last week, GAP published a special report asking Buncombe County to adopt a comprehensive anti-displacement policy as part of its housing strategy. As of this week’s report, we have not yet received a response from County staff or Commissioners. We’ll continue to follow this issue and report on any developments as they occur.
Active Issue Reports
Community advocacy helped preserve funding for 126 affordable apartments
POSITIVE
Summary: While we continue to have concerns about the transparency and long-term efficiency of the Renew NC homeowner reconstruction program, we believe the final CDBG-DR housing amendment represents a significant improvement over the proposal originally presented to the public last December. We’re proud of the part GAPavl played in influencing that outcome, and think it’s important to acknowledge and appreciate the fact that the City listened to community concerns, revised its plans, and preserved important investments in affordable multifamily housing.
The Facts: In April 2025, Asheville City Council approved its CDBG-DR Housing Action Plan, allocating approximately $28 million for the development of affordable multifamily housing and $3 million for the Renew NC homeowner repair and reconstruction program.
In December, 2025, City staff presented a proposed amendment: because demand for single-family homeowner assistance was much greater than anticipated, they proposed to shift approximately $17 million from the multifamily affordable housing program into the Renew NC program.
After several additional revision proposals, City staff’s final proposed amendment to the action plan was published in May. Rather than shifting $17 million from multifamily housing, this final amendment shifted $9.2 million from the multifamily affordable housing allocation and $10 million originally intended for infrastructure into the Renew NC homeowner repair and reconstruction program. This amendment left approximately $18.8 million available for affordable multifamily housing. City Council approved this amendment on June 23, 2026.
Using that $18.8 million in CDBG-DR funding, the City has now approved three affordable housing developments:
- District East Commons — $1.39 million to support 93 affordable apartments.
- 319-B Biltmore — $7 million to support 112 affordable apartments.
- Terrace at River Hills — $9.5 million to support 126 affordable apartments, serving households earning 20% to 80% of Area Median Income (AMI). Fourteen of those units will serve households at 20–30% AMI, while 86 units (68%) will serve households below 60% AMI. This represents deeper affordability than is common for projects of this size in Asheville. The apartments will remain affordable for at least 35 years.
Together, these three developments will create 331 affordable homes for Asheville residents.
Our Assessment: When the initial proposed amendment was first presented in December, we were deeply concerned by the scale of the reduction in funding for affordable multifamily housing. As we saw it, this was a critical need that pre-existed Hurricane Helene, but which was deeply exacerbated by the storm and its aftermath. Shifting approximately $17 million from vitally needed affordable housing construction would have profound consequences to many of the most impacted residents of our City.
Over the following months, many members of the community – including the City’s own Housing Recovery Board, affordable housing organizations, neighborhood advocates, and GAPavl – raised questions about the proposal. Much of that discussion focused on the Renew NC homeowner repair and reconstruction program. We questioned whether rebuilding homes once repair costs exceeded a relatively low threshold represented the best use of limited federal recovery funds, and whether there were ways to provide more homeowner assistance while also preserving a larger investment in affordable multifamily housing.
Some of those questions remain. We still have concerns about the transparency of the Renew NC program and continue to believe the City should release anonymized information showing approved properties, estimated repair costs, and pre-storm property values so the public can better evaluate how these federal funds are being used. We also continue to believe there may have been better solutions than the amendment ultimately adopted.
That said, the final amendment was substantially better than the proposal originally presented in December. By reducing the shift away from multifamily housing from $17 million to $9.2 million, the City preserved enough funding to continue making major investments in affordable housing. Most notably, the City was able to approve $9.5 million for Terrace at River Hills, creating 126 affordable homes, including many serving households with the lowest incomes. Had the original December proposal been adopted, funding for that project would not have been available through the CDBG-DR multifamily housing program.
We’re proud to have been one of many voices advocating for a better approach. Just as importantly, we appreciate City staff and City Council for listening to community concerns, revising their proposal, and ultimately adopting a plan that better balances the urgent need for homeowner recovery with the equally important need to expand Asheville’s affordable housing supply.
Things to do: Use our template to contact key City staff and City Council to thank them for listening to community input and ultimately developing a housing recovery plan that will create 331 affordable homes for Asheville residents.
Email Template: You can send an email to Community Development Division Manager James Shelton, CDBG-DR Program Manager Elma King, CDBG-DR Housing Programs Lead Amber Stapleton, City Manager DK Wesley and the members of the Asheville City Council by filling out the form below. Our email tool will send an individually addressed email to the recipients, and enable us to track how many emails were sent overall in the campaign. If you prefer to write your own email, you can copy and paste (and adapt) our template text – please cc: or bcc: info@gapavl.org on your individualized email, so we can better track how many emails were sent.
Important: If you receive a response to your email, please forward it to us at info@gapavl.org so we can reflect that in the report back.
To: jshelton2@ashevillenc.gov, eking@ashevillenc.gov, astapleton@ashevillenc.gov, dwesley@ashevillenc.gov, AshevilleNCCouncil@ashevillenc.gov
CC: or BCC: info@gapavl.org
Subject: Thank you for protecting affordable housing
Dear Mr. Shelton, Ms. King, Ms. Stapleton, City Manager Wesley, and City Council,
Thank you for your work on Asheville’s CDBG-DR housing recovery amendment and for your willingness to listen to community feedback throughout this process.
I appreciate that the final amendment preserved substantially more funding for affordable multifamily housing than the proposal presented last December. Because of those changes, the City has been able to invest in projects like Terrace at River Hills, which will create 126 affordable apartments for Asheville residents, including 100 at deeply affordable rents.
I know there were no easy answers in balancing the urgent need for homeowner recovery with the equally important need to expand our affordable housing supply. While I hope the City will continue seeking transparency around the Renew NC homeowner repair and reconstruction program, I want to thank you for taking community input seriously and working toward a better outcome.
Thoughtful public engagement works best when government is willing to listen. I appreciate your willingness to do so, and I hope the City will continue building on this collaborative approach as Asheville’s recovery moves forward.
Thank you for your service to our community.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
REPORT BACK STATUS
Unresolved
Report Back
Coming Soon!
Building on Buncombe County’s Commitment to Preventing Displacement
QUESTIONABLE
Update (7/6/26): We shared our special report with Buncombe County leaders on Monday, June 29, and are still awaiting a reply. We’ll continue to keep you updated.
Executive Summary
For more than six months, the Government Accountability Project of Asheville (GAPavl) has encouraged Buncombe County to strengthen its approach to preventing displacement by developing a comprehensive anti-displacement analysis framework. Throughout that time, we have recognized that County leaders view displacement as an important challenge and have invested in affordable housing, disaster recovery, home repair, and other initiatives intended to help residents remain in their communities.
Two weeks ago, County Commission Chair Amanda Edwards and Commissioner Terri Wells responded to our recommendations by encouraging us to revisit the County’s 2043 Comprehensive Plan, the June 16 Growth Impact Strategies presentation by Planning Director Nathan Pennington, the Helene Recovery and Strategic Plans, and the Swannanoa Small Area Plan.
We appreciated that invitation and reviewed each of these carefully.
Our review deepened our understanding of how Buncombe County approaches displacement. The County sees many of its planning, housing, recovery, and community development efforts as part of a broader, coordinated approach grounded in the Comprehensive Plan rather than as isolated programs or initiatives.
That deeper understanding also clarified where GAPavl’s perspective differs from the County’s. It is not about whether displacement matters or whether the County is taking meaningful action. Rather, it is about how the County’s existing planning and analytical tools should continue evolving to better support implementation decisions, evaluate displacement impacts, and learn from outcomes over time.
Throughout this report, we use the phrase anti-displacement analysis framework to describe a practical system that helps governments.
We are not recommending another housing program or another comprehensive plan. We are recommending a way to strengthen how the County implements the plans and programs it already has.
In our view, Buncombe County has built a strong foundation for preventing displacement. The opportunity now is to build on that foundation by strengthening how displacement considerations inform significant County decisions and continuous learning over time.
Our special report summarizes Buncombe County’s perspective in its own words, identifies the many areas where we found common ground, and explains why we believe this evolution represents the natural next step in implementing the County’s long-term vision.
(You can read our older reports on this issue here.)
Things to do: This week, we are inviting County leaders to respond directly to this report, so we are not suggesting any action as we await that response. To read the full special report, click here.
REPORT BACK STATUS
Unresolved
Report Back
Coming Soon!
PREVIOUS REPORTS
GAP Report for 6/29/26
Building on Buncombe County’s Commitment to Preventing Displacement (new) Last week, Buncombe County responded to GAP’s earlier report, explaining that it already has a number of policies and programs intended to reduce displacement. We agree that the County has taken...
GAP Report for 6/22/26
Public land should create the greatest possible public benefit (new) Overall, we view this as a promising proposal and an example of the City using public resources to address the housing crisis. At the same time, important questions remain about whether the project’s...
GAP Report for 6/15/26
0 Items Buncombe County still won’t answer questions about displacement (new) Asheville should support both affordable housing construction and home repair (updated with new template) o Items Asheville should complete its affordable housing recovery investments...
GAP Report for 6/8/26
0 Items Asheville should support both affordable housing construction and home repair (still time to act) 0 Items Asheville should complete its affordable housing recovery investments (approved!) Buncombe County’s housing investments need an anti-displacement strategy...
GAP Report for 6/1/26
0 Items Buncombe County’s housing investments need an anti-displacement strategy (new) Asheville should support both affordable housing construction and home repair (new) 0 Items Asheville should shift public safety funding toward prevention and community stability...
