GAP Report for 11/9/26
QUESTIONABLE
Who gets a voice in choosing Asheville’s next City Council member?
Asheville City Council must appoint someone to fill the seat Kim Roney will vacate when she becomes mayor. This decision should be made through an open, fair, and transparent process that allows qualified residents to apply, gives the public a meaningful opportunity to participate, and ensures that all applicants receive fair consideration. Council will discuss the vacancy at Tuesday’s Policy, Finance, and Infrastructure work session, where public comment is not permitted. Council should not move toward a predetermined outcome without first hearing from the community.
REPORT BACKS
Treatment Court grant could expand recovery and help ensure everyone gets a fair chance
Buncombe County Commissioners unanimously approved the $1 million federal grant to strengthen the County’s treatment courts, a decision GAP strongly supported. During the discussion, Commissioner Drew Ball asked how American University’s evaluation support would improve the program, and staff described assistance with data collection and analysis. However, no one addressed our central recommendation: that the County examine and publicly report whether racial and ethnic disparities exist in who enters treatment court, who completes it, and who is terminated. We welcome the grant’s approval, but this important accountability question remains unanswered.
Active Issue Reports
Who gets a voice in choosing Asheville’s next City Council member?
QUESTIONABLE
Summary: Asheville City Council must appoint someone to fill the seat Kim Roney will vacate when she becomes mayor. This decision should be made through an open, fair, and transparent process that allows qualified residents to apply, gives the public a meaningful opportunity to participate, and ensures that all applicants receive fair consideration. Council will discuss the vacancy at Tuesday’s Policy, Finance, and Infrastructure work session, where public comment is not permitted. Council should not move toward a predetermined outcome without first hearing from the community.
The Facts: Kim Roney’s election as Asheville’s next mayor will create a vacancy on City Council when she takes office December 8. Under North Carolina law and the Asheville City Charter, the remaining Council members must appoint someone to serve the remainder of her Council term.
According to the City Attorney, Council has broad discretion in determining how to fill the vacancy. There is no prescribed application process or legal deadline for making the appointment, although the final decision must occur in an open meeting.
At Council’s November 5 agenda briefing, members began discussing how to approach the appointment. Further discussion was deferred until the November 10 Policy, Finance, and Infrastructure work session at 3 p.m. Although the meeting is open to the public, public comment is not permitted.
You can read the memo by City Attorney Brad Branham on the legal process for filling a vacancy here.
Our Assessment: The public deserves a voice in choosing who represents them.
An appointment to elected office should not be treated as a formality or a decision made before the community has an opportunity to participate. The responsibility to fill a vacant Council seat carries an obligation to ensure fairness, transparency, and public accountability.
Qualified Asheville residents should have an opportunity to apply and present their experience, qualifications, and vision for the city. The public should be able to review those qualifications, hear directly from applicants, and express its views before Council makes a decision.
The election sent a message about how Asheville residents expect their government to operate. Honoring the voters’ wishes means respecting their call for transparency, accountability, and meaningful public participation. That commitment should begin with an open and fair appointment process where anyone qualified can apply and the community has a voice before any decision is made.
An open meeting alone does not constitute meaningful public participation. Transparency requires more than allowing residents to observe a decision. It requires giving them a genuine opportunity to help inform that decision.
We are not advocating for or against any individual seeking the appointment. Nor should this discussion begin with assumptions about who deserves the seat. Our responsibility is to advocate for a fair opportunity for all qualified applicants and a meaningful voice for the residents they would represent.
The question should not be who has already been identified as the next Council member. It should be whether Asheville residents have been given a fair opportunity to participate in determining who will represent them.
Council should establish clear application requirements, publicly announce the opportunity, allow applicants to present their qualifications, provide time for public comment, and deliberate openly before making its selection.
Let people apply. Let the public be heard. Let the decision be transparent.
Anything less risks undermining public confidence in the appointment and the commitment to accountable government that Asheville residents deserve.
Disclosure: Three members of GAP’s Strategy Team were candidates in the 2026 Asheville City Council election and could potentially seek appointment to the vacant seat. GAP does not endorse any applicant. Our position is that every qualified resident deserves fair consideration through an open and transparent process with meaningful public participation.
Things to do: Email Asheville City Council (using our template below) before Tuesday’s work session and urge members to establish an open, fair, and transparent appointment process that includes:
- A publicly announced opportunity for qualified residents to apply.
- Public access to applicants’ qualifications and priorities.
- A meaningful opportunity for residents to speak before a decision is made.
- Open deliberation and a transparent final selection.
Council should use Tuesday’s meeting to establish how residents will participate, not to effectively determine the appointment before the public has been heard.
Email Template: You can send an email to the Asheville City Council by filling out the form below. Our email tool will send an individually addressed email to the recipients, and enable us to track how many emails were sent overall in the campaign. If you prefer to write your own email, you can copy and paste (and adapt) our template text – please cc: or bcc: info@gapavl.org on your individualized email, so we can better track how many emails were sent.
Important: If you receive a response to your email, please forward it to us at info@gapavl.org so we can reflect that in the report back.
To: ashevillenccouncil@ashevillenc.gov
CC: or BCC: info@gapavl.org
Subject: Give Asheville residents a voice in filling the Council vacancy
Dear Mayor Manheimer and Members of City Council,
I urge you to ensure that the appointment to Asheville’s vacant City Council seat is open, fair, transparent, and includes meaningful public participation.
Qualified residents should have the opportunity to apply, present their qualifications, and receive fair consideration. The public should have an opportunity to hear from applicants and express its views before Council makes its decision.
Transparency and public participation were central to Kim Roney’s campaign for mayor. The appointment to the seat she vacates should reflect those same principles.
Please do not move toward a predetermined outcome without first giving Asheville residents a meaningful voice.
Thank you for your consideration.
[Name]
[Neighborhood, optional]
Treatment Court grant could expand recovery and help ensure everyone gets a fair chance
POSITIVE
REPORT BACK STATUS
Unresolved
Report Back
Buncombe County Commissioners unanimously approved the $1 million federal grant to strengthen the County’s treatment courts, a decision GAP strongly supported. During the discussion, Commissioner Drew Ball asked how American University’s evaluation support would improve the program, and staff described assistance with data collection and analysis. However, no one addressed our central recommendation: that the County examine and publicly report whether racial and ethnic disparities exist in who enters treatment court, who completes it, and who is terminated. We welcome the grant’s approval, but this important accountability question remains unanswered.
The grant will support the County’s treatment courts over five years, including continued funding for an in-house clinician and assistance with safe, stable housing. Treatment Court Supervisor Jillian Davis explained that the clinician helps address gaps in community treatment services and provides individualized therapeutic interventions. She also highlighted the County’s work with All Rise, the national treatment court organization, noting that ASPIRE Court is becoming an academy court where other jurisdictions can learn from Buncombe’s practices.
Commissioner Drew Ball specifically asked about the evaluation support provided by American University. Davis explained that Dr. Jamie Vaskey assists with data collection, interpretation, and grant development. This was a welcome question, and the answer confirmed that the County has access to expertise that could help it assess and improve its programs. But the discussion did not establish what outcomes are being evaluated, whether results are examined by race and ethnicity, or how findings are used to address disparities.
As we explained last week, national research has found racial disparities in access to and completion of treatment courts, and national best-practice standards call for regular monitoring of such disparities. We are not assuming those inequities exist in Buncombe County. We are asking the County to find out. With this new funding and expanded evaluation capacity, the County has an opportunity to demonstrate that its treatment courts provide everyone a fair chance to participate and succeed. We will continue encouraging the County to make that examination part of its ongoing evaluation and public reporting.
Total GAP Supporter Actions Taken: 10
Recipients and Responses:
Buncombe County Commission
- County Commission Chair Amanda Edwards: No response
- County Commissioner Al Whitesides: No response
- County Commissioner Drew Ball: No response
- County Commissioner Jennifer Horton: No response
- County Commissioner Martin Moore: No response
- County Commissioner Parker Sloane: No response
- County Commissioner Terri Wells: No response
Summary: Buncombe County Commissioners will consider accepting a $1 million federal grant to strengthen the County’s three treatment courts, expanding treatment, transitional housing, transportation, and other supports while improving data collection and evaluation. We support the grant. However, because national treatment court research has found racial disparities in who gets referred, admitted, and successfully completes these programs, we also encourage the County to use its expanded evaluation capacity to examine and publicly report whether those disparities exist here.
The Facts: Buncombe County Justice Services has received a $1 million grant from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance, covering October 2026 through September 2030. Commissioners are being asked Thursday to accept the grant and approve the corresponding budget amendment.
The money will support three existing programs: Adult Drug Treatment Court, ASPIRE Court for people with repeat impaired-driving convictions and substance-use disorders, and Veterans Treatment Court. Rather than relying solely on incarceration or conventional probation, treatment courts combine judicial supervision with substance-use treatment, case management, drug testing and recovery supports. Buncombe’s grant will: continue an in-house clinician providing individualized treatment and assessment-driven case plans; expand transitional housing and transportation assistance; strengthen drug-testing capacity; provide staff training; improve data collection, monitoring and referral tracking; and expand program evaluation, with support from American University.
The County expects the investment to increase treatment participation and successful completion while reducing substance use and recidivism. You can read more about the grant here.
Our Assessment: Treatment courts can offer people struggling with substance-use disorders an important alternative to a criminal-justice system built primarily around punishment. Housing, transportation, individualized treatment, and other practical supports can also address some of the barriers that make sustained recovery difficult. For all of these reasons: we strongly support accepting this grant and strengthening these services.
But access to an alternative is equitable only if similarly situated people have a similar opportunity to receive and successfully complete it. National research gives reason to examine that question carefully. The Adult Treatment Court Best Practice Standards (most recently updated in 2023) reports disparities at multiple stages of the process: Black defendants have been less likely to be referred or admitted to treatment courts in some studies and a large multi-court study found lower successful-completion rates among Black participants than white participants. The standards therefore call on treatment courts to monitor their operations at least annually for racial, ethnic, and other disparities and address disparities they identify. (You can read more in this All Rise Adult Treatment Court Best Practice Standard report – see page 36 for the research on disparities, and page 38 for the suggested monitoring practices.)
This also connects to a broader accountability issue Buncombe County has already identified. The City/County Cease the Harm audit, completed in 2024, identified inconsistent collection of racial demographic data across City and County programs as one of its four major findings. The audit warned that these gaps make it difficult to assess who benefits from government programs and whether they are producing equitable outcomes.
The new grant creates an opportunity to address that broader concern within Buncombe County’s treatment courts. It explicitly supports better data collection, monitoring, and evaluation. The County should use that capacity to examine the treatment court pathway from beginning to end: Who is referred? Who is found eligible? Who is admitted? Who receives sanctions or additional support? Who completes the program? Who is terminated, and why? The County should examine each stage by race and ethnicity, identify any significant disparities, and publicly report aggregate findings and corrective actions while protecting participants’ privacy.
Buncombe County already describes addressing racial and ethnic disparities as one of the priorities of its Criminal Justice Coordinating Council. But we have not found current public reporting showing whether referrals, admissions, completion, and termination from the County’s treatment courts differ by race or ethnicity.
We are not assuming that inequities exist in Buncombe County’s treatment courts. But national research gives us good reason to ask whether they do. If the data reveal no significant disparities, that would be reassuring. If disparities emerge, the County and its court partners should investigate where they arise and what changes could address them. That is what meaningful evaluation and continuous improvement should accomplish.
Things to do: We are not suggesting any further action at this time. Last week, we invited you to email County Commissioners and ask them to accept the Treatment Court Enhancement Grant while ensuring that the expanded evaluation tracks and publicly reports racial and ethnic disparities in access, participation, and outcomes.
PREVIOUS REPORTS
GAP Report for 11/2/26
Treatment Court grant could expand recovery and help ensure everyone gets a fair chance Buncombe County Commissioners will consider accepting a $1 million federal grant to strengthen the County’s three treatment courts, expanding treatment, transitional housing,...
GAP Report for 10/26/26
Weighing housing and flood safety on London Road City Council will consider adding 44 apartments to the previously approved development at 21 London Road. We welcome the potential housing benefit and have not identified evidence that the project would harm nearby...
GAP Report for 10/19/26
Buncombe County can turn its Swannanoa plan into an anti-displacement test case Buncombe County Commissioners will receive a briefing Tuesday on the proposed Swannanoa Small Area and Resilience Plan, which will guide growth, recovery and investment in the community...
GAP Report for 10/12/26
Asheville considers $6 million to prevent homelessness Asheville City Council will consider accepting a $6 million grant to help prevent homelessness among at least 1,000 vulnerable households over three years. We support this investment in keeping people housed and...
GAP Report for 10/5/26
County seeks $290,000 for surveillance technology without explaining what residents are buying Buncombe County Commissioners are being asked Tuesday to approve $290,000 from forfeiture funds for the Sheriff's Office's FY27 FUSUS/Axon contract and a "Camera Project at...
